| 1 |
On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:15:28 -0500 |
| 2 |
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, David Leverton |
| 4 |
> <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > yourself, "shell-like". "printf -v EAPI 1" is perfectly valid |
| 6 |
> > shell (at least if we decide to allow bash 3.1 features), and has |
| 7 |
> > the same effect |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> To stir things up: |
| 10 |
> Who decides this? There are more and more bash-3.1 features in the |
| 11 |
> tree and I brought it up to the Council months ago becase the PMS says |
| 12 |
> that only bash-3.0 is allowed but no one cares. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Can't allow newer bash features in global scope until the whole "can't |
| 15 |
make global scope changes" thing is sorted out. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives