Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal?
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:32:53
Message-Id: 4429644F.9090206@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? by "Fernando J. Pereda"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
5 > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 06:39:15AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
6 >> git : c+bash (and optional perl/python for some merge scripts)
7
8 I think git is probably the best choice, I have played with it a little
9 myself and it is _very_ powerful, it also has a very simple dependency
10 set (all it's deps are in the Gentoo core system, and are either
11 available or installed by default on every *NIX I know of).
12
13 I agree with Flameeyes that it would be best if we use a DVCS that
14 doesn't have too many deps that might or might not work on other
15 platforms/systems.
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
18 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
19
20 iD8DBQFEKWRPWt/XSf2CZdkRArDgAJ4mQx/cnxQSBpKpL2o+N9/jnTqR1QCeMG4L
21 yJzx6zyCEUJpv2Db4h6iX5s=
22 =UgNs
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@×××××.com>