Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aiko Barz <aiko@××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea?
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:03:57
Message-Id: 20040430230348.GA18182@lain.chroot.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea? by Nick Rout
1 On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:36:56AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
2 >
3 > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
4 > Ajai Khattri <ajai@××××.net> wrote:
5 >
6 > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Eldad Zack wrote:
7 > >
8 > > > The best way is to allow run-time configuration in /etc files.
9
10 I don't like the idea. I know it from Debian. For Debian it's ok, but
11 gentoo is different.
12
13 > some ebuilds tell you to run a configuration script after the ebuild
14 > completes (although often this disappears in the other cruft that emerge
15 > throws past you)
16
17 In my opinion, that's the best argument for using a run-time
18 configuration.
19 But even this wouldn't work out. I've got a celeron 333MHz, which is
20 running gentoo. I don't want to look after my machine every hour to
21 receive a new "run-time configuration"-instruction. ;)
22 So you would need at least some kind of "default-choice" for people,
23 that do not want to be asked.
24
25 I would prefer an update logfile, which can be viewed and deleted with
26 etc-update. This log could keep all hints, which have been made during
27 the last update.
28
29 Bis denne,
30 Aiko
31
32 --
33 .~. Aiko Barz
34 /v\
35 // \\ Mail: aiko@××××××.de
36 /( _ )\ Web: http://www.chroot.de
37 ^^ ^^ PGP: http://www.chroot.de/index.php?navi=GnuPG