| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 12:34, Travis Tilley wrote: |
| 5 |
> 3) devfs isnt going away any time soon, and there will be people like me |
| 6 |
> who dont think it's a good idea to risk bugs for no apparent benefit. |
| 7 |
And me. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The same goes for the kernel; I'll read the 2.6 changelogs and depending on |
| 10 |
what I read I set marks, when to consider to switch (again). My current mark |
| 11 |
is 2.6.10, but this may change, if I still have to read e.g. too much about |
| 12 |
code changes regarding reiserfs. What I'm reading here about "encouraging" |
| 13 |
users to switch to kernel 2.6 and udev sounds not very friendly to |
| 14 |
conservative users. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Carsten |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
iD8DBQFA/k3FVwbzmvGLSW8RAvu3AKCPRHUCb9myv8/8QZ4JDlFFEt+A7wCeLWcJ |
| 22 |
4kIHJp7mmHg96pWn40z/b4k= |
| 23 |
=FQk2 |
| 24 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives