[gentoo-dev] RE: Changes to date format of current GLEPs

[Dan Meltzer]

Whoops, sending to the list is a good idea

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:51:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs
To: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>

Nope, but the changes further on.

>   Created: <date created on, in dd-mmm-yyyy format>
> The Created header records the date that the GLEP was assigned a number, while > Post-History is used to record the dates of when new versions of the GLEP are
> posted to gentoo-dev. Both headers should be in dd-mmm-yyyy format, e.g.
> 14-Aug-2001.

Should

On 12/13/05, Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Meltzer schrieb:
> | Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an
> ammendatory GLEP
>
> I would apply these changes to glep-0001.txt:
> dvandyk@phi glep $ cvs diff glep-0001.txt
> Index: glep-0001.txt
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.txt,v
> retrieving revision 1.8
> diff -u -b -B -r1.8 glep-0001.txt
> - --- glep-0001.txt       4 Apr 2004 23:05:35 -0000       1.8
> +++ glep-0001.txt       13 Dec 2005 20:45:37 -0000
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
> ~ Status: Active
> ~ Type: Informational
> ~ Content-Type: text/x-rst
> - -Created: 31-May-2003
> - -Post-History: 1-Jun-2003, 2-Jul-2003
> +Created: 2003-05-31
> +Post-History: 2003-06-01, 2003-07-02
>
> Do you _really_ think this make a GLEP necessary?
>
> Danny
> - --
> Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
> Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDnzUXaVNL8NrtU6IRAnruAJ4zXT5+gtyvKHi3BbD1EPvJYACCYwCgmG6z
> FW28Kz5W3N1nFz3ZJuPOEh8=
> =tVHu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list