| 1 |
On Sun, 2001-09-23 at 05:22, Bruce A. Locke wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hello... Enabling sound support in BitchX requires esound 0.2.5 or |
| 4 |
better. |
| 5 |
> The only version of esound we have in portage is 0.2.22. The problem |
| 6 |
> with this is that 0.2.22 is _not_ newer then 0.2.5. And with sound |
| 7 |
> support enabled BitchX's configure script bombs horribly so for now |
| 8 |
I've |
| 9 |
> commented out such support from BitchX's ebuild. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So we have two issues, the first is the esound versioning problem. |
| 12 |
The |
| 13 |
> second was I couldn't get esound 0.2.8 to compile anyways after 15 |
| 14 |
minutes |
| 15 |
> of playing with it. :( |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Any comments? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
hi |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
ok, attached is esound-0.2.8.ebuild and esddsp.c.diff (which should go |
| 22 |
in the files dir). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
i had to patch esddsp because it needs RTLD_NEXT defined in #include |
| 25 |
<dlfcn.h>. only problem is, for it to get defined, __USE_GNU needs to |
| 26 |
be defined. but for some wierd reason even if defineing it in esddsp.d, |
| 27 |
it does not get passed to #include <dlfcn.h> as being defined. i am on |
| 28 |
gcc-2.95.3-r5, if someone can trie with another version (gcc 3.01 ??), |
| 29 |
it would be appreciated. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
also there is problems with ALSA support, so i disabled it. i dont use |
| 32 |
ALSA so im assuming esd should work ok with ALSA OSS emolution ?!? |
| 33 |
dont know what the problem is, but it seems the version of ALSA that |
| 34 |
gentoo use dont have all the strucktures and functions esound-0.2.8 |
| 35 |
needs defined ... same with 0.2.7, so maybe we need to use a newer |
| 36 |
version of ALSA (0.9 maybe ?). |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
greetings |
| 39 |
MS |
Archives