| 1 |
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 13:40:23 Arfrever wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2012-01-18 12:37:12 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): |
| 3 |
> > i agree that for some users, they've never heard of the the ARM NEON |
| 4 |
> > extensions, but they have heard of the neon library. i'd counter that |
| 5 |
> > with a few points: (1) i don't think there are any packages in the tree |
| 6 |
> > that have optional neon (the library) support |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/net-libs/neon lists 6 |
| 9 |
> packages, which optionally depend on net-libs/neon. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
fair enough. some of those deps prob still wouldn't be USE=neon since they're |
| 12 |
webdev related, and others are xml related. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
but too late now as the ship as sailed for everyone :). |
| 15 |
-mike |
Archives