| 1 |
Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
> 4) Jer marked #530478 as a dupe of #426262, |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
To me that looks bogus. #530478 is about app-office/dia while #426262 |
| 5 |
is about two eclasses. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Jeroen - please explain why you consider 530478 a duplicate of 426262? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I note that you did not do so in Bugzilla while marking the dupe, but |
| 10 |
I think an explanation is very much warranted in this case. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I would have understood if you simply noted that 530478 was *related* |
| 13 |
to 426262, but duplicate has a distinct and very different meaning. Right? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And please see if you can adopt a better tone. Your tone in |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530478#c4 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
sounds quite nasty for no apparent reason. :\ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
//Peter |
Archives