Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gnome-panel wants to downgrade...
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:03:03
Message-Id: 20030318170300.GA15173@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gnome-panel wants to downgrade... by Matthew Walker
1 Recent versions of Portage will show UD for packages that're actually
2 going to be downgraded and just U when they're in different SLOTs, I
3 think.
4
5 On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:56:52AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote:
6 > Then I'd like to propose a new feature for portage. ;)
7 >
8 > There is no visual indication in the output of emerge -pu world that tells
9 > me those are in different slots. And since I apparently still have a 1.4
10 > panel version installed, shouldn't it show /that/ as the package it's
11 > upgrading?
12 >
13 > Jon Portnoy said:
14 > > It's safe. They're in different SLOTs.
15 > >
16 > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:50:13AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote:
17 > >> Is there some reason gnome-panel wants to downgrade from version 2.2.1
18 > >> to version 1.4.2-r2? Is it safe to let it downgrade?
19 > >>
20 > >> I've been avoiding letting portage 'update' gnome-panel for a while now,
21 > >> but I'm getting tired of it, and want to know what I should do.
22 > >>
23 > >> Matthew
24 > >>
25 > >>
26 > >>
27 > >> --
28 > >> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
29 > >
30 > > --
31 > > Jon Portnoy
32 > >
33 > > --
34 > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
35 >
36 >
37 >
38 >
39 > --
40 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
41
42 --
43 Jon Portnoy
44
45 --
46 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gnome-panel wants to downgrade... Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net>