1 |
Recent versions of Portage will show UD for packages that're actually |
2 |
going to be downgraded and just U when they're in different SLOTs, I |
3 |
think. |
4 |
|
5 |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:56:52AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote: |
6 |
> Then I'd like to propose a new feature for portage. ;) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> There is no visual indication in the output of emerge -pu world that tells |
9 |
> me those are in different slots. And since I apparently still have a 1.4 |
10 |
> panel version installed, shouldn't it show /that/ as the package it's |
11 |
> upgrading? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Jon Portnoy said: |
14 |
> > It's safe. They're in different SLOTs. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:50:13AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote: |
17 |
> >> Is there some reason gnome-panel wants to downgrade from version 2.2.1 |
18 |
> >> to version 1.4.2-r2? Is it safe to let it downgrade? |
19 |
> >> |
20 |
> >> I've been avoiding letting portage 'update' gnome-panel for a while now, |
21 |
> >> but I'm getting tired of it, and want to know what I should do. |
22 |
> >> |
23 |
> >> Matthew |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> >> |
26 |
> >> |
27 |
> >> -- |
28 |
> >> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > -- |
31 |
> > Jon Portnoy |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > -- |
34 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Jon Portnoy |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |