| 1 |
On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> + if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then |
| 3 |
> + eqawarn "built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE deps." |
| 4 |
> + elif has $EAPI 2 3; then |
| 5 |
> + if [[ $hidden == yes ]] || $missing_was_set; then |
| 6 |
> + eqawarn "built_with_use in EAPI=$EAPI without --missing or -- |
| 7 |
hidden |
| 8 |
> usage, should use USE deps instead." + else |
| 9 |
> + eqawarn "built_with_use should not be used; upgrade to EAPI=4 |
| 10 |
instead" |
| 11 |
> + fi |
| 12 |
> + fi |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
i'd do: |
| 15 |
case ${EAPI:-0} in |
| 16 |
# No support in these EAPIs, so don't warn. |
| 17 |
0|1) ;; |
| 18 |
# Maybe warn as some functionality exist. |
| 19 |
2|3) [[...]] && eqawarn "..." ;; |
| 20 |
# Assume EAPI=4 or newer where all functionality exists. |
| 21 |
*) eqawarn "..." ;; |
| 22 |
esac |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives