Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:32:36
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing by "Paweł Hajdan
1 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
2 > Also, I think it may be useful for other arch teams (like amd64). One
3 > solution would be to add yet another flag, like amd64-at, but maybe we
4 > can have some better ideas.
5 The problem here is that it becomes extremely messy when more and more
6 arches want the same functionality. 13 common arches, 3 fbsd arches, and
7 lots variations from the Prefix arches. This would take up a LOT of
8 screen space in Bugzilla unfortunately.
10 How about the following instead, going into the status whiteboard:
11 AT:x86:+
12 AT:x86:-
13 AT:x86:?
14 with the same meanings that you defined.
16 It should be just as easy to search, and you can do it today already.
18 --
19 Robin Hugh Johnson
20 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
21 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
22 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>