| 1 |
Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:14:04 |
| 2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > > I would prefer if I needed to allow such mode upgrades explicitly. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > That sounds like a lot ebuilds failing, requesting you to explicitly |
| 7 |
> > change the mode. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think that's OK. If I've set a mode then I prefer failures over an |
| 10 |
> eclass automagically modifying my setting. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I now hit an issue that I can't think of a way to handle through |
| 13 |
explicit failures. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Submodules need to be fetched via commit hash rather than a ref. Due to |
| 16 |
that, we need to fetch them in 'single' mode at least. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Now, it is perfectly fine to clone the top repository with submodules |
| 19 |
in shallow mode. However, the submodules need to be cloned in 'single' |
| 20 |
mode. With explicit failure, we are forcing the user to switch modes |
| 21 |
for both repositories. Implicit fallback would make things worse. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Any idea? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
Archives