| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 12/03/14 03:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> All, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> thinking about this further, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> There may not be a need to remove /etc/init.d/functions.sh as long |
| 10 |
> as it is understood that this is part of OpenRc, not the gentoo |
| 11 |
> base. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> In other words, tools that must work when OpenRc is not present |
| 14 |
> should source /lib/gentoo/functions.sh, NOT |
| 15 |
> /etc/init.d/functions.sh. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What are your thoughts on this approach? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> William |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Well, this will leave the de-facto path intact for the majority of |
| 24 |
users, which sounds great to me. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This path -wont- be available for users that don't have openrc |
| 27 |
installed, but then, if all of the tools in portage are converted to |
| 28 |
use /lib/gentoo/functions.sh this probably won't matter -- i dont |
| 29 |
think many custom script writers using a systemd system will care |
| 30 |
about output consistency with openrc anyhow. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlMgwZoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDcPgEAhSkoJma2GVfUeKpRoIcvHEQD |
| 37 |
tivcbFdpHRF3xTtssUYA/RXQvFCkwyqiALsu1Jm94fGTsjT1aCHxYA96oefY++Fv |
| 38 |
=Vu5p |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives