1 |
On 17 June 2010 02:01, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On 16-06-2010 16:39, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
4 |
>> On 6/16/10 5:33 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
5 |
>>> - With these Code of Conduct rules in place how come DevRel |
6 |
>>> is not publicly reminding of these rules where necessary? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> I think the initiative is on the offended person's side. If a developer |
9 |
>> is being aggressive and needlessly argumentative towards other people, |
10 |
>> that's clearly a misconduct. Similarly for aggressive users. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> There is a common misconception here that I feel the need to address. It |
13 |
> was never the direct responsibility of the Developer Relations team to |
14 |
> "police" the communication mediums nor was it assigned the |
15 |
> responsibility to enforce the CoC. |
16 |
|
17 |
DevRel is repsonsible for solving conflicts between developers. |
18 |
Apparently I am not the only one who expects DevRel to take an active |
19 |
role in enforcing the CoC, at least where it concerns inter-developer |
20 |
relations. If this is not DevRel's task, then this should be made |
21 |
explicit. |
22 |
|
23 |
> There was a mostly silent agreement between some teams, including |
24 |
> DevRel, UserRel, Council and Trustees, that after the Proctors project |
25 |
> was terminated, the enforcement of the CoC, including any moderation or |
26 |
> banning actions, would fall to the UserRel team. |
27 |
|
28 |
This is very worrying. Such things should never be a silent agreement. |
29 |
This needs to be open and transparent. This is policy that needs to be |
30 |
explicit. |
31 |
|
32 |
Cheers, |
33 |
Ben |