| 1 |
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:20:54 +0100 |
| 2 |
Niels Vandekeybus <niels.vandekeybus@×××××××××××××××××××.be> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I was just wandering why fluxbox-9.7.0 is marked stable for x86, when |
| 7 |
> the official stable version (according to http://www.fluxbox.org/) is |
| 8 |
> still 0.1.14? not that I'm experiencing any problems with it, it just |
| 9 |
> didn't seem right. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It has improved a lot and we don't want new Gentoo users (as we probably |
| 12 |
will have with the 2004.0 release) dealing with a _very_ old fluxbox |
| 13 |
version. The 0.9.{6,7} versions have been proven to be very stable, so |
| 14 |
there is really no reason to don't mark them stable. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
(o_ Markus Nigbur |
| 18 |
//\ Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 19 |
[ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org |
Archives