| 1 |
On Sunday 02 April 2006 14:22, Olivier Crête wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2006-02-04 at 13:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 02 April 2006 12:05, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > This is a (not-so happy) reminder that the agony of gtk2 use flag will |
| 5 |
> > > have been lasting for half a year soon. It *really* needs to die. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > too bad it doesnt address packages which still legitimately utilize |
| 8 |
> > gtk/gtk2 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Is there a legitimate reason to use gtk1 if the gtk2 support is useable? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
nothing personal, but who are you to say whether it's legit ? if a package |
| 13 |
provides the interfaces and users like to use them, where's the bug ? ive |
| 14 |
seen peeps from time to time who bring the hate on gtk2 because of its |
| 15 |
fattiness compared to gtk1 ... they like to build packages that still can be |
| 16 |
against gtk1 |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives