| 1 |
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into |
| 2 |
testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users |
| 3 |
could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore |
| 4 |
the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure? |
| 5 |
Dne 3.3.2013 3:43 "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@g.o> napsal(a): |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Saturday 02 March 2013 21:01:39 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confuse |
| 10 |
> > > already installed go down in fire. it literally makes 0 difference |
| 11 |
> > > here. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Why would they have it installed (in stable) if it had no keywords? and |
| 14 |
> if |
| 15 |
> > it is such an important package why it didn't have testing keywords in |
| 16 |
> the |
| 17 |
> > first place? I did't say it broke something, it just feels strange and |
| 18 |
> this |
| 19 |
> > is why I asked |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> sounds like there's no further clarification necessary |
| 22 |
> -mike |
| 23 |
> |
Archives