| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> 11.10.2005, 10:52:35, Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>On Tuesday 11 of October 2005 10:47 Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>>Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or whatever it |
| 8 |
>>>would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due to the constant |
| 9 |
>>>flames... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>>Nothing, of course. But how would you prevent flames from happening on a new |
| 13 |
>>list? :-) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>>Cheers, |
| 17 |
>>-jkt |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Hint: read-only ml? :=) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Bad idea, we have that already with -announce (only a handful of people |
| 22 |
can post there IIRC). Better let Reply-To and similar headers point back |
| 23 |
to -core or -dev (and/or reject any messages with present In-Reply-To |
| 24 |
headers). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Marius |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives