From: | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory | ||
Date: | Tue, 17 May 2011 20:37:23 | ||
Message-Id: | m34o4tcbg3.fsf@jhcloos.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory by William Hubbs |
1 | >>>>> "WH" == William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> writes: |
2 | |
3 | WH> Once /run is in place, |
4 | |
5 | WH> /var/run will be a symbolic link to /run and /var/lock will |
6 | WH> be a symbolic link to /run/lock. |
7 | |
8 | There are files which need to be in /var/lock and which should |
9 | survive a reboot, so it is not a good idea to make /var/lock |
10 | a symlink to /run/lock. |
11 | |
12 | (And I don't just mean .keep files.) |
13 | |
14 | -JimC |
15 | -- |
16 | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |