| 1 |
hasufell posted on Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:20:14 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> However, we should encourage gentoo-internal projects to become more |
| 4 |
> strict (and e.g. only have one or two "pushers"). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Just noting there's also the "review required, but after getting it, go |
| 7 |
ahead and push" model. Same number of pushers, but better |
| 8 |
professionalism and code quality. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It seems to be working very well for portage, now, and I'm pleased to see |
| 11 |
the greater bus factor as well as higher professionalism and code |
| 12 |
quality, that seems to be the result. =:^) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And the fact that they're pushing the posting and reviews to the portage- |
| 15 |
dev list increases transparency as well, for those non-devs that like to |
| 16 |
follow developments on such system- and gentoo-critical packages. =:^) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 20 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 21 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives