Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Ruppert <idl0r@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:08:17
Message-Id: 4DB9749C.70301@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow by Christian Ruppert
1 So once again:
2
3 https://bugs.gentoo.org/docs/en/html/lifecycle.html
4
5 *Every* new bug filed by a user without editbugs will have "UNCONFIRMED"
6 (old NEW) as fixed status.
7 *If* we don't enable the UNCONFIRMED status at all then it will
8 CONFIRMED as default but we would enable the UNCONFIRMED status.
9
10 Bug wranglers can then assign the bug and they also *can* mark it as
11 CONFIRMED *if* they *can* confirm it.
12 The maintainer may change the status to IN_PROGRESS (old ASSIGNED)
13 afterwards.
14
15 The snipped of my first mail may be a bit confusing... It just means:
16 NEW will become CONFIRMED, NEW has been fully replaced by CONFIRMED so
17 NEW is gone but CONFIRMED is *not* the new default status. CONFIRMED
18 would/could be the default for everybody with editbugs.
19 ASSIGNED gone, replacement: IN_PROGRESS,
20 REOPENED gone,
21 CLOSED gone. VERIFIED will be added.
22
23 So I think we should convert...
24
25 --
26 Regards,
27 Christian Ruppert
28 Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure
29 member
30 Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Panagiotis Christopoulos <pchrist@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Alex Alexander <wired@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Christian Ruppert <idl0r@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com>