| 1 |
On poniedziałek, 30 stycznia 2017 14:04:06 CET William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like what I |
| 5 |
> see. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to the |
| 8 |
> meson build system [3]. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja as |
| 11 |
> build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system where |
| 12 |
> we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or portability) |
| 13 |
> outweighs that. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What do folks think here? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'd recommend to jump a bandwagon and switch to CMake. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yes, it's ugly in certain areas, has its quirks but whoever switches to it |
| 20 |
ones, never goes back, and not because of technical debt being too big. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Also because I can help with it (and a lot of folks can), while Meson is still |
| 23 |
largely unknown. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
regards |
| 27 |
MM |
Archives