Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 06:36:05
Message-Id: 1337841278.8478.0.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Ezequiel Garcia
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 17:00 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia escribió:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: > > I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git > > Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems > > and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's > > good enough for you. > > > Perhaps it would be instructive if you could tell us one advantage of > cvs over git. > > (This is me exposing me to your terrible dev-flames, I was feeling too cold ;) > >
I think Arun's comment was sarcastic ;) I guess that cvsserver bug can be dropped from blockers, no? Now, the other pending blockers... :(


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature