| 1 |
On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case |
| 4 |
>> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about |
| 5 |
>> > “secret-service”? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I think this is a good idea. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will |
| 11 |
>understand what "secret*" means in this context |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is also in use on other OSes. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Marecki |
Archives