From: | Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: EAPI-2 support | ||
Date: | Mon, 03 Nov 2008 06:01:58 | ||
Message-Id: | 200811030700.34515.loki_val@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: EAPI-2 support by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | On Monday 03 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > This eclass needs to do the same thing as the other eclasses that got |
4 | > EAPI=2 patches and default EAPI to 0 when it's not defined, |
5 | > everywhere where it tests the value of EAPI. |
6 | |
7 | Yes, that makes sense, though grepping for EAPI in eclass/ shows me that |
8 | not all chose that approach. |
9 | |
10 | Updated patch attached. |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | /PA |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
base.eclass.patch | text/x-diff |
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: EAPI-2 support | Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |