Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:37:19
Message-Id: 1585084158.20060228172257@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Ciaran McCreesh
1 28.2.2006, 16:42:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:26:37 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
4 > | If you can't do any better, then please apologize for your conduct
5 > | and false claims and shut up... TIA.
6
7 > Sure I can do better. But you didn't originally ask for better, you
8 > asked for anything. If better's what you're after:
9
10 > SLOT="${PVR}"
11
12 Eh? Seen kernel2.eclass? Going to file a bug about that as well? Seen
13 gst/gstreamer eclasses? Going to file QA bugs about them as well? And -
14 what's exactly the QA violation there, if you could enlighten us?
15
16 Maybe I could point you to
17 http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/devmanual//general-concepts/slotting/ ?
18
19 > Now, please apologise for insinuating that I don't have any real claims
20 > to make. I find it extremely offensive that you're questioning my
21 > technical ability.
22
23 No, I won't apologize, I don't see any reason to do it after all the baloney
24 you've shown here. I have to agree w/ rl03 that your benefits for this whole
25 project are net negative.
26
27
28 --
29 Best regards,
30
31 Jakub Moc
32 mailto:jakub@g.o
33 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
34 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
35
36 ... still no signature ;)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>