1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 12/07/12 03:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:01:21 +0800 Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> On 12 July 2012 07:42, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
9 |
>> wrote: |
10 |
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò |
11 |
>>> wrote: |
12 |
>>>> Il 11/07/2012 21:11, William Hubbs ha scritto: |
13 |
>>>>> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move |
14 |
>>>>> everything currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>>> Unless you're going to establish a symlink, please keep it |
17 |
>>>> under p.mask until everything is using some common code — |
18 |
>>>> otherwise things _will_ break. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> Since multiple packages put things in /lib/udev, I'm not sure |
21 |
>>> it is possible to establish a symlink from /lib/udev to |
22 |
>>> /usr/lib/udev if that's what you mean; I'll look into it |
23 |
>>> though. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Couldn't you, on udev upgrade, move everything in /lib/udev to |
26 |
>> /usr/lib/udev, and then make the symlink? Seems fairly simple to |
27 |
>> me, but maybe I'm overlooking something? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> You are overlooking conflicts introduced through moving files |
30 |
> without updating vardb. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
There were no vdb issues when baselayout-1 was migrated to |
34 |
baselayout-2, and it rewrote a whackload of stuff iirc... |
35 |
|
36 |
Updating vdb shouldn't be an issue here, as long as pkg_postinst |
37 |
doesn't crash mid-stream. Is the vdb common between package managers |
38 |
or does each one have a different solution? |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
43 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
44 |
|
45 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk/+1XUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBKdgD/S3jlct63PVIKE8UmHW4jEanZ |
46 |
T2/lgnF/cUzTSlsyrEQA/iQWSvOcowsgI/r2VUlJLFpltNVea/f8pm5wKq5F4cjk |
47 |
=HA5O |
48 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |