1 |
On 30/06/14 18:16, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
2 |
> On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > [snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should |
5 |
> > still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about |
6 |
> > future stabilizations, and the virtual only had ~arch reverse |
7 |
> > deps). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> There shouldn't be any need to read minds, here -- if the previous |
11 |
> stable perl had this capability, then the new stable perl should too |
12 |
|
13 |
that's nonsense, if upstreams remove features, even working ones, it |
14 |
might not make everyone happy, but they are well within their |
15 |
rights to do that (like, upower dropping hibernate/suspend support) |
16 |
|
17 |
and if someone isn't happy about it, they can always fork |
18 |
|
19 |
- Samuli |