Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:28:21
Message-Id: 46057B39.6070902@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 >
3 > Assuming you mean piotr, who is not pioto... The difference is, piotr's
4 > proposal is possible and doable within the timeframe, whereas lu_zero's
5 > sounds nice if you don't know anything about any of the package
6 > managers in question and can't be delivered within three months.
7
8 I'd like to know your opinion about which are the pitfalls and the
9 issues since you are surely more informed than me on paludis and, to a
10 large degree, on portage internals.
11
12 I assumed that for a foundation and a non exaustive converage the summer
13 would be more than enough.
14
15 I'm more interested in a solid base than a complete and exaustive wrapper =)
16
17 lu
18
19 PS: if the other project leaders would like to chip in I wouldn't be
20 offended ^^
21
22 --
23
24 Luca Barbato
25
26 Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
27 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>