| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Monday 16 August 2004 05:56, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
> > And no, I don't have the time or interest to read multiple blogs. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Fair enough, don't maintain a blog then. :-) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Never. :) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> If a dev wishes to maintain a blog, it's their choice, and it's their |
| 12 |
> time to allocate as they see fit. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Right. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > We have the GWN already. Why not adding a "opinion" section? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> You're trivializing blogs by assuming it's automatically going to be |
| 19 |
> opinion drivel; this may be the case, but honestly, that's the author's |
| 20 |
> discretion. If this goes ahead, and all the blogs are is opinion's, |
| 21 |
> fine, we yank it (they can host their own blog if they want to expound |
| 22 |
> on why vim rocks and emacs sucks). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Oh, I like opinions, even if I have to disagree. A rant about something that |
| 25 |
not works is not that bad, if it results in a set of fixes. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> In my eyes, the GWN is a user |
| 28 |
> resource; blogs would function as a dev resource, a way to get info out |
| 29 |
> there for those users who might be interested. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Can't follow here. I expect important dev stuff to be discussed in the mailing |
| 32 |
lists. Both blogs and GWN are aimed at users, imho. I would still prefer a |
| 33 |
single ressource with a little quality review. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Carsten |
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFBIlhJVwbzmvGLSW8RArclAJ9A+SCsDrrZpHtyZFrAKMmsH0ShJwCfZfoN |
| 41 |
1PsF968VP+MTzrF7Nieavxw= |
| 42 |
=H2gr |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives