| 1 |
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: [Sun Mar 25 2007, 07:35:33AM CDT] |
| 2 |
> Supposedly >80% of our stuff is hosted in one building, where would we |
| 3 |
> find ourselves were this building to building to burn to the ground? Get |
| 4 |
> flooded? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Looking through |
| 7 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/server-specs.xml, |
| 8 |
that 80% number doesn't seem right. Where's your number coming |
| 9 |
from? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Now it is true that 100% of our CVS server (presumably our most critical |
| 12 |
resource) is located in one place (Global Netoptex, it seems), but I |
| 13 |
have a hard time seeing how that could be otherwise, given the nature of |
| 14 |
CVS. I assume that infra regularly backs up the repository to an |
| 15 |
alternative site, so disaster there would be survivable. *Shrug* From |
| 16 |
what I can tell, our resources aren't really all that localized. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Incidentally, the language of the proposed change would probably prevent |
| 19 |
us from relying on freenode as our sole IRC host, since freenode would |
| 20 |
certainly count as a single vendor. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-g2boojum- |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 27 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 28 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives