1 |
1.3.2006, 1:40:53, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 19:28, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:13:57 -0600 Lance Albertson |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> <ramereth@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>> | I should note that if are a Gentoo Developer and have |
8 |
>> | problems/concerns/issues with Ciaran's attitude/actions, please |
9 |
>> | comment on bug #114944. (this bug is only open to Gentoo developers). |
10 |
>> | Its better if you say it yourself in this bug rather than letting |
11 |
>> | other people quoting what you say. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> I should note that if you are a Gentoo developer who has found my |
14 |
>> advice helpful, you should comment on bug #114944 since certain people |
15 |
>> are trying to turn Gentoo development into a popularity contest. |
16 |
|
17 |
> there's a lot more to the issue, but it's sad if that's all you see in the bug |
18 |
> -mike |
19 |
|
20 |
Indeed. Ciaran, that bug is not about technical competence; it's about your |
21 |
civil communication skills, that are as lacking as penguins on the Sahara |
22 |
desert in your case. Technical skills themselves are not useful for a |
23 |
project the requires you to communicate w/ other people in a civilized |
24 |
manner. |
25 |
|
26 |
As someone else noted, certains "skills" might be fit for a car salesmen but |
27 |
not for developers of a Linux distro. If a company hires a technically |
28 |
brilliant QA guy only to find out later on that this brilliant guy has |
29 |
killed the whole team while communicating his finding to others in such |
30 |
style you have shown on this thread and on many other occasions before, |
31 |
it'll be the QA guy who gets booted out, not the whole team. If that doesn't |
32 |
happen soon enough, the rest of the team can leave meanwhile and the whole |
33 |
business is doomed. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
|
37 |
jakub |