1 |
Petteri Räty napsal(a): |
2 |
> Dan Meltzer kirjoitti: |
3 |
>> mmm, by this arguement news should be written for every version bump, |
4 |
>> explaining what has changed in the package that is user visible. It would |
5 |
>> definatly improve the users experience if they knew what they were upgrading |
6 |
>> to, not just that they were upgrading. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> For the standard version bumps people should be documenting things like |
10 |
> this in ChangeLog. Too bad it's usually just "Version bump. Fixes bug |
11 |
> #XXXXXX." |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, 'fixes bug #XXXXXX' is still way more useful entry than 'many |
14 |
bugfixes' or nothing at all in ChangeLog - which is not so rare at all, |
15 |
unfortunately :/ |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
|
21 |
Jakub Moc |
22 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
23 |
GPG signature: |
24 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
25 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
26 |
|
27 |
... still no signature ;) |