| 1 |
On Thursday 22 July 2004 16:15, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Wouldn't it be a bit better to spend slightly more of your time to get |
| 3 |
> the bug right than to spend a lot of every single arch dev's time trying |
| 4 |
> to figure out whether you *really* meant "all archs" and whether the bug |
| 5 |
> has been fixed on their arch already? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Sure. But we've already established that there isn't a single place to look |
| 8 |
for a list of arches. I believe we left the conversation on IRC with Kurt |
| 9 |
looking into how to solve that one. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Chances are, you don't really mean all archs anyway. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Chances are I mean all but the one I use. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Best regards, |
| 16 |
Stu |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 19 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 20 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 23 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 24 |
-- |
Archives