1 |
Hey, all! |
2 |
|
3 |
Just one question: why do you all talking about IUSE=+oldnet, but not |
4 |
REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( net oldnet )" for example? |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
24.04.2013 23:16, William Hubbs пишет: |
9 |
> All, |
10 |
> |
11 |
> it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be split out into |
12 |
> their own package separate from OpenRC so that they can be developed |
13 |
> independently. I am looking at doing this for OpenRC 0.12, which I hope |
14 |
> to release soon. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> This means when you emerge or upgrade to openrc-0.12, the net.* scripts |
17 |
> will no longer be included. I am going to call the separate package that |
18 |
> includes these scripts gentoo-oldnet. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> My plan is to write a newsitem when OpenRC 0.12 is released |
21 |
> telling users this and that they will have to emerge gentoo-oldnet to |
22 |
> get the gentoo networking scripts or turn on the newnet (maybe I'll |
23 |
> change this to net) use flag to get OpenRC's network scripts installed |
24 |
> and put ewarns in the ebuild if this use flag is turned off. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I feel that a newsitem and ewarns in the OpenRC ebuild cover live |
27 |
> systems well. In a nutshell, users should pay attention to their news |
28 |
> items and ewarns. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> On the other hand, some are suggesting that I should add a runtime |
31 |
> dependency to OpenRC so that it pulls in gentoo-oldnet. Since OpenRC |
32 |
> doesn't need gentoo-oldnet in order to run, I feel like this would be |
33 |
> abusing dependencies. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Does anyone have any thoughts? |
36 |
> |
37 |
> William |
38 |
> |