1 |
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> >> So, anyone been thinking about this? I have, and it's not pretty. |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to |
8 |
> >> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that |
9 |
> I've |
10 |
> >> been wondering about. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Microsoft |
15 |
> any ransom money. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Last I heard Verisign was handling the signing certs, but that also doesn't |
19 |
mean MS isn't getting a cut of the profit. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
- Matt |