| 1 |
On Friday 18 November 2005 07:23 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> See, it's a question of quality rather than numbers. One "it works" |
| 3 |
> report from someone who knows what they're doing is worth far more than |
| 4 |
> a thousand "it works" reports from random users. Expecting a large |
| 5 |
> number of average Joe types to produce useful testing reports is like |
| 6 |
> expecting a large number of average Joe types to produce a Wikipedia |
| 7 |
> article on how quantum cryptography works or a large number of average |
| 8 |
> Joe types to produce a Gentoo Wiki article on the design and internal |
| 9 |
> workings of versionator.eclass. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Fair enough |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> There was a similar proposal from (?)rac a couple of years back. Might |
| 14 |
> be worth looking at why arch teams hated it last time around. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
will do |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Corey Shields |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team |
| 21 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 22 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
Archives