1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM GMT+09:00, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Alice wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>>> GNU FSDG-compliance require not only removing non-free code but also |
7 |
>>>> to disable loading of known non-free firmware. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> So they actually remove code that by itself is free software. I had |
10 |
>> suspected that. (By what logic does removing an option add to the |
11 |
>> user's freedom and choice, though? :) |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>> I also point you to some other information from the mailing list |
14 |
>>> https://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2020-August/003400.html |
15 |
>>> https://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2021-May/003419.html |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Thank you. Looks like there's no issue with the LICENSE="GPL-2" label |
18 |
>> for recent kernels then. |
19 |
|
20 |
> that's not what they are saying. |
21 |
|
22 |
The first posting references a discussion on Wikipedia (which I think is |
23 |
a third party with a more neutral point of view than Linux-libre): |
24 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Linux_kernel/Archive_7#RfC_on_the_Linux_kernel_licensing_rules |
25 |
|
26 |
I tend to agree with their conclusion, which resulted in the following |
27 |
wording: |
28 |
|
29 |
"The official kernel, that is the Linus git branch at the kernel.org |
30 |
repository, does not contain any kind of proprietary code; however Linux |
31 |
can search the filesystems to locate proprietary firmware, drivers, and |
32 |
other executable modules (collectively known as "binary blobs"), then it |
33 |
can load and link them into the kernel space." |
34 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Firmware_binary_blobs |
35 |
|
36 |
> but I repeat again please open a thread to their own mailing list not |
37 |
> here. |
38 |
|
39 |
Sorry, but I don't care about the Linux-libre patches, only about the |
40 |
mainline kernel. So if anything, I would start a thread on the LKML |
41 |
about concrete files that violate the GPL. Then again, I don't have |
42 |
evidence of any such files (see above). |
43 |
|
44 |
Ulrich |