Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | ||
| Date: | Sat, 31 May 2008 01:50:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080531025020.7d7da9d7@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) by Brian Harring |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 30 May 2008 18:43:56 -0700 |
| 2 | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > So... folks have pointed out a benefit to using --as-needed. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | But they haven't. They've pointed out a flaw in libtool that is sort of |
| 6 | worked around sometimes at the expense of breaking things by using |
| 7 | as-needed. The correct solution is to fix libtool, but that's evidently |
| 8 | beyond the abilities of people who're only interested in increasing |
| 9 | their epenis size by throwing more silly options in config files. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> |