From: | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff) | ||
Date: | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:47:26 | ||
Message-Id: | 44E5E044.1040308@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff) by Simon Toth |
1 | Simon Toth wrote: |
2 | > Hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > I posted this to the bugzilla, but was redirected here, so: |
5 | > |
6 | > INTRO: |
7 | > I have just a small proposal. There are many theme packages in portage, |
8 | > but many good are still missing, the problem I actually noticed when |
9 | > creating my own ebuild for comix cursors, is that there is really a mess |
10 | > in theme packages. They are both in media-gfx and x11-themes, they are |
11 | > named without any convention. |
12 | |
13 | What would be more interesting is something like app-portage/g-cpan for |
14 | various themes sites. This way, individual themes wouldn't need to get |
15 | packaged and maintained. |
16 | |
17 | Thanks, |
18 | Donnie |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff) | Simon Toth <happy.cerberus@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff) | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> |