Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:59:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090224225850.179814b6@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) by Luca Barbato |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:48:27 +0100 |
| 2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 | > > Not true. You don't know whether the cache is valid until you know |
| 5 | > > what the EAPI is. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > If you are on the user scenario the cache is valid. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Uh. Wrong. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > > Can't use the cache until you know what the EAPI is. |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > The current cache holds all the current portage needs to know what to |
| 14 | > ignore, providing the cache in such format will make portage ignore |
| 15 | > any future change. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Uh. Wrong. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | The information used to validate a cache entry is only usable if you |
| 20 | know the behaviour of 'inherit' that was used to create the entry. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | -- |
| 23 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o> |