| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:30:55AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +0000, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > ssuominen 10/10/28 09:25:23 |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild |
| 6 |
> > Log: |
| 7 |
> > qa |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of |
| 10 |
> what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious. |
| 11 |
> I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are apparently considered to |
| 12 |
> be justified by "QA". |
| 13 |
As the maintainer of the package in question, I'd like to ask: |
| 14 |
If you're changing a package I maintain, put SOMETHING in the Changelog. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Secondly, I'm wondering if this should have been a revbump: your |
| 17 |
addition of tc-export could have changed the results. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 22 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 23 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives