| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:44:31 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >> I think it is more like people do that when they have a good reason |
| 7 |
> >> to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the chance and |
| 8 |
> >> know that this init crap isn't going to break my rig. It's not |
| 9 |
> >> being "awesome" either. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were |
| 12 |
> > mostly hacks and laziness. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> /usr can be mounted readonly, while / and /var cannot? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
What is the point of mounting the less important part of the system |
| 17 |
read-only while the more important one is writable? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Also, it should be possible to mount rootfs read-only with |
| 20 |
separate /var. Of course, that would require the software to be |
| 21 |
actually FHS-compliant and not put runtime-written files in /etc. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
Archives