| 1 |
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 10:44:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > But, moving ppc* to exp wouldn't lead us to likely break their tree? |
| 4 |
> > (because we wouldn't get any dependency issue even with "base" |
| 5 |
> > packages...) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I was thinking in this plan: |
| 8 |
> - Get a list with all packages stable on ppc |
| 9 |
> - Drop from that list what ppc teams want |
| 10 |
> - Run on all that packages ekeyword ~ppc* |
| 11 |
> - Run repoman to the full tree to fix the dependencies, use.stable.mask |
| 12 |
> some, tune the list of stable packages... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Much better. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Moving the profile to exp is only a last resort. If you can reasonably keep a |
| 17 |
smaller stable set consistent, do it! |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 23 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 24 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives