1 |
Just curious. Who are you sending patches to? Gentoo scripters, or |
2 |
independent QT/GTK developers? |
3 |
What kind of patches are you refering to? Gcc3.2 or kernel patches? |
4 |
Why arent any patches in the cvs tree? How many questions can I fit |
5 |
onto one paragraph? |
6 |
|
7 |
I'm kind of confused as I thought that pretty much all gentoo related |
8 |
code were script based. If this is not the case, then is it possible to |
9 |
get a list of gentoo specific modules that may be affected by future GCC |
10 |
upgrades? I ask this because I tend to use the latest GCC CVS |
11 |
snapshots for my development (currently gcc 3.1.3). |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Michael Mattsson |
16 |
Kyrana Inc. |
17 |
michel@××××××.com |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
> -----Original Message----- |
22 |
|
23 |
> 3.2 is labeled by GNU to be 100% multi-vender compliant with |
24 |
> the C++ ABI |
25 |
> now. Which is the core prob with the new gcc releases. By skipping |
26 |
> straight to 3.2 we'll avoid 2 problem transitions.. 1 from |
27 |
> 2.95 to 3.1 |
28 |
> and then from 3.1/3.1.1 to 3.2 instead we'll have 2.95 to |
29 |
> 3.2. As one of |
30 |
> the gcc-3.1/gcc-3.2 Gentoo guys I support this plan (was one |
31 |
> of the ones |
32 |
> calling for it among the devs) and I'm working hard with all |
33 |
> the other |
34 |
> guys to send upstream patches to developers to make sure their |
35 |
> applications are ready for the new gcc-3.2 platform. (this |
36 |
> will benefit |
37 |
> all distros). |
38 |
> |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> Doug Goldstein |
41 |
> Developer (Laptops, WiFi, GCC-3.1) |
42 |
> Gentoo Linux |
43 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ |
44 |
> |