| 1 |
Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> "Having functional changes mixed with whitespace/cosmetics in a single |
| 4 |
> commit makes it hard to read and understand." |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Also, in this case I see only one extra hunk. |
| 7 |
>> But once we have proper tools (like git) we can revisit this. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs |
| 10 |
> commit twice with cvs. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already pointed |
| 13 |
out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything but. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So at least in the sense that it'll be less hassle, two git commits |
| 16 |
followed by a push should be much easier than two repoman and cvs commits. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 20 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 21 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives