1 |
Chris Gianelloni posted <1119281987.13606.26.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net>, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:39:47 -0400: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 05:17 -0700, Duncan wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> I get the point, but if it's not there to be started, it cannot be |
7 |
>> started, thru some fat-fingering on the part of a confused admin trying to |
8 |
>> launch the client, or any other way. USE flags (not split |
9 |
>> packages, I'll absolutely agree there) are the Gentoo way to control that. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499 |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Personally, I am completely against it. It makes dependencies a |
14 |
> complete nightmare to work with and would add an immense amount of |
15 |
> complexity for the developers and also for users that aren't going to |
16 |
> need/use this system. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> You have the tools to remove the binaries already. Use them. |
19 |
|
20 |
I didn't realize it had been bugged to death. I guess others have said it |
21 |
before, and everybody's likely very tired of the rehash, so despite my |
22 |
opinions, I'll just shut up, now... =8^] |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
26 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
27 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
28 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |