Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: splitting one source package into many binaries
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:13:29
Message-Id: pan.2005.06.21.02.10.56.732245@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: splitting one source package into many binaries by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni posted <1119281987.13606.26.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net>,
2 excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:39:47 -0400:
3
4 > On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 05:17 -0700, Duncan wrote:
5 >>
6 >> I get the point, but if it's not there to be started, it cannot be
7 >> started, thru some fat-fingering on the part of a confused admin trying to
8 >> launch the client, or any other way. USE flags (not split
9 >> packages, I'll absolutely agree there) are the Gentoo way to control that.
10 >
11 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
12 >
13 > Personally, I am completely against it. It makes dependencies a
14 > complete nightmare to work with and would add an immense amount of
15 > complexity for the developers and also for users that aren't going to
16 > need/use this system.
17 >
18 > You have the tools to remove the binaries already. Use them.
19
20 I didn't realize it had been bugged to death. I guess others have said it
21 before, and everybody's likely very tired of the rehash, so despite my
22 opinions, I'll just shut up, now... =8^]
23
24 --
25 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
26 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
27 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
28 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list