Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new repoman check
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:02:08
Message-Id: 20060605125708.09617250@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new repoman check by "Harald van Dijk"
1 On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:56:16 +0200 Harald van Dijk <truedfx@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | The devmanual states that they should not "generally" be added to the
4 | tree softmasked or unmasked. It does not state that they should never
5 | be added as such at all. Or, in other words, there can be exceptions.
6
7 It's not a hard ban because when I wrote it I was thinking that maybe
8 some day someone would come up with a legitimate reason for it. You've
9 yet to do that, so you don't get to take the exception clause.
10
11 --
12 Ciaran McCreesh
13 Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk
14
15
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] new repoman check "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>