1 |
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 14:24:27 |
3 |
> Davide Pesavento <pesa@g.o> napisał(a): |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> > Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 13:37:03 |
7 |
>> > Davide Pesavento <pesa@g.o> napisał(a): |
8 |
>> > |
9 |
>> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
10 |
>> >> > While at it, I also added some 'unsupported' wrappers to ban trying to |
11 |
>> >> > use pythonY (accidental fallback to system python) when pythonX is |
12 |
>> >> > selected via wrapper, and changed the exit code for unsupp-scripts. |
13 |
>> >> |
14 |
>> >> Can you clarify the consequences of this change please? e.g. is it |
15 |
>> >> still possible to call "naked" python2 from src_prepare() of a package |
16 |
>> >> using python-r1.eclass, such as dev-python/sip? |
17 |
>> > |
18 |
>> > If you call python_setup and ensure python2 is selected beforehand, |
19 |
>> > yes. Otherwise, you're doing a QA violation and it never were supported. |
20 |
>> > |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> Funny. I'm pretty sure you suggested the current implementation |
23 |
>> (directly calling python2) when we first switched to |
24 |
>> python-r1.eclass... |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Nope. I'm pretty sure I never suggested or accepted any kind of direct |
27 |
> dev-lang/python dependencies or python[23] calls. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Seriously, I'm not blaming you (or anybody else), but please just try |
31 |
to be a little less arrogant and self-righteous in your emails. If you |
32 |
don't believe me, look at your #gentoo-python logs around Jan 21, |
33 |
2013. Also consider that python_setup was only introduced 9 months |
34 |
after the conversion of dev-python/sip. |
35 |
|
36 |
Anyway, I guess I have to fix sip-4.9999 then ;) |
37 |
|
38 |
Thanks, |
39 |
Davide |