Archives
Archives
| From: | R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | aliz@g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords | ||
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:45:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4381336F.9010007@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords by Daniel Ahlberg |
||
| 1 | Daniel Ahlberg wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > * if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail |
| 6 | under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages in |
| 7 | this list so I'm interested in knowing what's worth fixing and what's being |
| 8 | pedantic. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | --de. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords | Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o> |